Sociological survey: MIRROR OF RUSSIA, 6 wave

Sociological survey: MIRROR OF RUSSIA, 6 wave

Russians believe that Ukraine itself blew up the Kakhovka dam and frequently discuss among each other the counteroffensive of the Ukrainian Armed Forces.

The Institute for Conflict Studies and Analysis of Russia (IKAR) conducted a monthly sociological survey called “Mirror of Russia”. The sixth wave was conducted on a nationwide sample during June 7 -June 21, 2023. The survey’s methodology is the CATI method (Computer Assisted Telephone Interview), a telephone survey using interactive structured questionnaires using special software for sociological surveys. A total of 1,600 respondents were interviewed.

Main results of the sixth wave of the survey:

More than three-quarters (79%) of Russian citizens would not support the decision to blow up the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant to slow down the advance of the Ukrainian Armed Forces. 7% of respondents support such a step.

At the same time, it’s important to note that the majority of Russians (65%) believe that Ukraine itself blew up the Kakhovka dam. Only 5% believe that Russia did it, and another 5% think the dam collapsed on its own. The reluctance of Russian citizens to acknowledge Russia’s responsibility for blowing up the Kakhovka dam can likely be extrapolated to their unwillingness to recognize any responsibility in case of a possible accident at the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant.

Only 14% of Russians believe that their country should participate financially in restoring Ukraine’s destroyed infrastructure under any circumstances. At the same time, 54% believe that the Russian Federation should finance the restoration of Ukraine only on its occupied territories. Another 19% agree with this only in case of the occupation of the entire Ukrainian territory. This data correlates with the results of an April survey when about three-quarters of Russians spoke out against paying reparations to Ukraine after the war.

Russian society frequently discusse the counteroffensive of the Ukrainian Armed Forces: 24% of respondents discuss it with their close ones and acquaintances every day, and 18% several times a week. At the same time, 16% do not talk about it at all. Meanwhile, 33% stated that they are afraid of the counteroffensive of the Ukrainian Armed Forces, and 52%, on the contrary, are not afraid of it.

In case of a successful counteroffensive by the Ukrainian Armed Forces, Russians comparatively more often (38%) spoke about the need of starting peace negotiations with Ukraine. Among other options for Russia in case of a successful Ukrainian offensive, the most frequently mentioned were: 20% believe that “Special Military operation” should be continued without any changes, another 20% advocate for shifting the country’s economy to a war footing, 17% consider it necessary to carry out a new wave of partial mobilization.

Only 14-15% of Russian citizens have not heard about drone attacks on the territory of Russia and, in particular, against Moscow. The remaining respondents either know about it in detailed manner (32%) or are at least partially informed (54%). Russians name the Russian Ministry of Defence, Russian air defence forces, and the local authorities, as responsible for allowing such attacks. At the same time, every fifth respondent believes that no one should be blamed.

Support of possible military aggression against the Baltic countries has remained virtually unchanged among Russians over the past six months. Only 14% would not support the so-called “SMO” against Lithuania, Latvia, and Estonia under any circumstances. Whereas 52% would support it in case of an attack by the Baltic countries on Russia, 23% would support it in favour of the Russian-speaking population being oppressed in these countries. Another 18% would consider recognition of the Baltic countries’ regimes as Nazi by Russia as such a reason.

Related research

See all research
Russian Interference in Electoral Processes: Risks for Ukraine
Research

Russian Interference in Electoral Processes: Risks for Ukraine

Russia uses common and proven approaches in its attempts to influence electoral processes in other countries. Significant efforts are directed at Russian-speaking voters in these countries and at presenting the elections there to their own citizens in the light necessary for internal political stability within the Russian Federation itself. Our research aims to analyze the…

Russian Interference in Electoral Processes: Risks for Ukraine
Sociological survey: MIRROR OF RUSSIA, 9 wave
Research

Sociological survey: MIRROR OF RUSSIA, 9 wave

Russians are very sensitive to the acceleration of inflation and mostly do not feel the danger of an attack by NATO. The Institute for Conflict Studies and Analysis of Russia (IKAR) conducted a sociological study dedicated to the third anniversary of the full-scale invasion as part of the monitoring of Russian society called the “Mirror…

Sociological survey: MIRROR OF RUSSIA, 9 wave
Sociological survey: EXPECTATIONS OF RUSSIANS FOR THE NEW PRESIDENT
Research

Sociological survey: EXPECTATIONS OF RUSSIANS FOR THE NEW PRESIDENT

Russians believe that the elected president should first of all focus on solving the financial problems of the population. The Institute for Conflict Studies and Analysis of Russia (ICAR) conducted a sociological survey dedicated to the attitudes of Russians before the presidential elections. From January 20 to February 3, 2024, a study was conducted on…

Sociological survey: EXPECTATIONS OF RUSSIANS FOR THE NEW PRESIDENT